“GUNMAN” Cho Seung-Hui is the man of the year according to mainstream media. How can I make a statement like that? Easy. Just ask yourself what information you know about the “GUNMAN”. Go ahead, what do you know about the “GUNMAN”? We know his name, where he’s from, when he came to America, we have seen his family’s apartment in Korea, he was a loner, etc. Now ask yourself what information you know about the innocent victims. You may have heard a few names and not much else. The “GUNMAN” Cho is the man of the year for mainstream media such as CNN, FNN, MSNBC, and USA TODAY because he is a story worth telling.
Mainstream media loves to tell Cho’s life story because of the agenda these elitist have. Number one: He is a “GUNMAN” instead of a cold-blooded evil murder, which makes the gun seem evil, and not Cho. Number two: He was a problem child who needed help. The rich whites would not help, so it is the white mans fault. Blame white America.
The facts are this kid was an evil person. He was not a “GUNMAN”. There are a lot of gunmen in America and they don’t go around spilling the blood of innocent people. Cho was a cold-blooded evil murder and I for one am glad he is dead. The world is much better off without him. I want mainstream media to tell the life stories of the innocent victims who Cho murdered. That however, does not fit mainstream medias agenda. And so it goes, sympathy will run rampant for Cho and everything and everybody will be to blame except for Cho himself. This is mainstream media.
PS: How many lives could have been saved had some of those students been allowed to exercise their second amendment rights to carry a personal firearm? Food for thought!!!
3 comments:
amen brother-well said.
we concur 180%. if more students carried guns to school the cold blooded killer cho seung-hui would have had to wait in line behind more qualified gunmen for his shot at man of the year.
AMEN, Sean!
Post a Comment